People like me gets bored in practising ourselves to be perfect in knowing HOW HOW and HOW something is happening. I am really sick of that; not because it is not important but it costs time,threatens our patience. However,i agree to the fact that,'in order to break something,you have to master it first';Thanks to Picasso. I also hope, that people with similar thoughts of mine exists; after all i need company in making my neuron networks more complex. :P
I had a misconception before that domination over powers soemting and evlution happens due to that. But the irony is,it's the realization that makes soemthing dominant and not the attitudeof being dominant. Why i want to mention this now,is to avoid my fellow readers' confusion that 'i am objectiong every HOW' formalism. I am not; and i won't have to.
When we come to the basic thoughts,deep into them the final problem will surely will be explain the reason for causality; the reason to cause the cause. Sadly,we are not ready to touch them yet.
Everything happens in time; Even 'happens' happen in time. I don't really know what will happen to this loopy time,poor thing.
However,what makes me interesting now is to think about something that doesn't involve time. Come on, i know that,i can't even thnk about it,without time; but i will,as i am a network of particles thinking about itself.
Lets assume that our universe didn't have time at all. We could then see stagnation around us all. I am still confused,whether we will be able to see at all,if no photons could rent little time. In a timeless wolrd,information isn't information at all. They are scattered pieces of unknown purpose,existing for unknown purpose. Probably you will shoot me a WHY to hit me,but there is no time,ypur can't send me that information without time. Right now,we are rebelling against stagnation. Time is the only hope we have. Could mathematics help us? I am not sure. The singular and the only existing reason,why i hate maths is that,they make no sense. It is purely axiomatic and never allows WHY to get raised. WHYs are slaughtered inside mathematics.
I am right now in the timeless universe. I don't have the pre-experienced knowledge of anything. How could i possibly be like this? Thinking? Accumulating information and trying to transmit them? Impossible. I am hoping for the better chances i will have in future.
But wait, chances? Do i have chances? Is it possible for chances to existwithout time? aren't they? isn't it obvious?
Well,they are. But how do i know it? chances are existing for me? like, how do the circuit knows how to use electric voltages to carryout what they are made into? Like how do objects knew,they could move if they gets some force? wait! How do the force even know,they are utilisable? Chances could exist,but where do the intelligence and laws came from? who taught them to act accordingly? May be they had no other options. They had lesser chances to get their freedom. Which obviously hints us that,natural laws are a consequence of higher probability to occur in that way;but i would like to interpret them as the consequence of unavailability of chances.
I had a misconception before that domination over powers soemting and evlution happens due to that. But the irony is,it's the realization that makes soemthing dominant and not the attitudeof being dominant. Why i want to mention this now,is to avoid my fellow readers' confusion that 'i am objectiong every HOW' formalism. I am not; and i won't have to.When we come to the basic thoughts,deep into them the final problem will surely will be explain the reason for causality; the reason to cause the cause. Sadly,we are not ready to touch them yet.
Everything happens in time; Even 'happens' happen in time. I don't really know what will happen to this loopy time,poor thing.
However,what makes me interesting now is to think about something that doesn't involve time. Come on, i know that,i can't even thnk about it,without time; but i will,as i am a network of particles thinking about itself.
Lets assume that our universe didn't have time at all. We could then see stagnation around us all. I am still confused,whether we will be able to see at all,if no photons could rent little time. In a timeless wolrd,information isn't information at all. They are scattered pieces of unknown purpose,existing for unknown purpose. Probably you will shoot me a WHY to hit me,but there is no time,ypur can't send me that information without time. Right now,we are rebelling against stagnation. Time is the only hope we have. Could mathematics help us? I am not sure. The singular and the only existing reason,why i hate maths is that,they make no sense. It is purely axiomatic and never allows WHY to get raised. WHYs are slaughtered inside mathematics.
I am right now in the timeless universe. I don't have the pre-experienced knowledge of anything. How could i possibly be like this? Thinking? Accumulating information and trying to transmit them? Impossible. I am hoping for the better chances i will have in future.
But wait, chances? Do i have chances? Is it possible for chances to existwithout time? aren't they? isn't it obvious?
Well,they are. But how do i know it? chances are existing for me? like, how do the circuit knows how to use electric voltages to carryout what they are made into? Like how do objects knew,they could move if they gets some force? wait! How do the force even know,they are utilisable? Chances could exist,but where do the intelligence and laws came from? who taught them to act accordingly? May be they had no other options. They had lesser chances to get their freedom. Which obviously hints us that,natural laws are a consequence of higher probability to occur in that way;but i would like to interpret them as the consequence of unavailability of chances.
إرسال تعليق